Makita XLC03ZBX4 (Amazon's Choice) vs Makita XLC02R1B (Amazon's Choice) Comparison
Side-by-side technical specification matrix comparing the Makita XLC03ZBX4 (Amazon's Choice) against the Makita XLC02R1B (Amazon's Choice). Compare tested suction power (kPa), decibel noise levels, dust capacity, HEPA filtration standards, and user satisfaction ratings.
Makita XLC03ZBX4 (Amazon's Choice) Review
Type: Stick Vacuums
Suction: 49 CFM kPa
Makita XLC02R1B (Amazon's Choice) Review
Type: Stick Vacuums
Suction: 46 CFM kPa
Side-by-Side Specifications Matrix
| Specification | Makita XLC03ZBX4 (Amazon's Choice) | Makita XLC02R1B (Amazon's Choice) |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Makita | Makita |
| Model | XLC03ZBX4 (Amazon's Choice) | XLC02R1B (Amazon's Choice) |
| Vacuum Type | Stick | Stick |
| Power Source | Cordless | Cordless |
| Bag / Bagless | Bagless | Bagless |
| Suction Pressure | 49 CFM kPa | 46 CFM kPa |
| Motor Power | - | 37 W |
| HEPA Filter | No / Standard | No / Standard |
| Dust Capacity | 0.75 L | 0.75 L |
| Noise Level | 70 dB | 71 dB |
| Weight | 2.7 lbs | 2.7 lbs |
| Star Rating | 4.4 / 5.0 | 4.5 / 5.0 |
Test Lab Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Choose the Makita XLC03ZBX4 (Amazon's Choice) if you prioritize higher suction metrics (49 CFM kPa) and specific floorhead tools for deep cleaning.
Choose the Makita XLC02R1B (Amazon's Choice) if you prefer lighter handling (2.7 lbs) and quiet operating sound levels (71 dB).
Comparisons Related to XLC03ZBX4 (Amazon's Choice)
XLC03ZBX4 (Amazon's Choice) vs XLC02RB1W (Amazon's Choice) Comparison
49 CFM kPa vs 46 CFM kPa suction
XLC03ZBX4 (Amazon's Choice) vs XLC08ZB Comparison
49 CFM kPa vs 39 CFM kPa suction
XLC03ZBX4 (Amazon's Choice) vs CL280FDZC (Amazon's Choice) Comparison
49 CFM kPa vs - kPa suction
Comparisons Related to XLC02R1B (Amazon's Choice)
XLC02R1B (Amazon's Choice) vs XLC02ZB Comparison
46 CFM kPa vs 46 CFM kPa suction
XLC02R1B (Amazon's Choice) vs XLC02ZW (Amazon's Choice) Comparison
46 CFM kPa vs 46 CFM kPa suction
XLC02R1B (Amazon's Choice) vs XLC11ZW Comparison
46 CFM kPa vs 35 CFM kPa suction